|
Home Page
|
| |
| |
| |
It is customary to say that the church has no name.
Early church members in Northern Ireland had excommunicated* Mr. Irvine. They'd stopped speaking with him and then they stopped speaking about him.
Down a few short generations this organization had entirely lost knowledge of its history at least officially. In other words, if anybody who was living while I was growing up knew about the real origin of The Truth,* they did not talk about it.
| |
| |
|
"Wecome to the club, grew up in same faith left and have survived long enough to become a grandfather so there is hope for you" from my guestbook april 2008
|
This other book, "The Secret Sect," (Doug and Helen Parker, 1982, Sydney, Macarthur Press) seemed objective. It was the most credible explanation for the existence of the religion in which I was raised. And, in my mind, "most credible" is the best.
The details in that book are not as important as the book's existence. The importance of its details is that they illustrate, with journalistic protocol, the essential fact that my childhood religion is not originally and eternally right, exclusive and inescapable. The importance of learning of the history of "The Truth" is in learning that the church has a history. That history had been lost shunned and forgotten. It was only my generation, in adulthood, that regained any such information.
At 29 years old, with this knowledge, I began to feel differently about my long failure to attend the meetings. The guilt began to decrease.
| |
|
| Contact |
| |
* "Professing," or "making one's choice," refers to the decision to become a member of "The Truth." This usually involves standing up during the singing of a hymn near the end of a "gospel meeting," or religious service, after one of the "workers," or ministers, "tests" the meeting, which they occasionally do.
Basically, in the "testing" of the gospel meeting, the senior of the two workers will ask if there's anyone in the meeting who wants to give their life to Christ, and if so they should stand to their feet during one of the final verses of the final song of the service.
Return to top of page ...
| |
| |
* Excommunication is, technically, a formal procedure to end "communion." It does not imply nor require the end of communication. It's an official corrective action mostly associated with the Catholic church, which has complex bureaucratic formulae for its application.
"The Truth" does not have any such official procedure (nor is it driven as much by specific dogma as it is by unspoken consensual doctrine.)
In the case of William Irvine, the church members expelled him from communion, and then quit speaking with him [and then about him.]
| |
| |
* It is disingenuous to say "if anybody knew" (about the origin of the church, while I was growing up.)
Calculating the length of time that some of the ministers had been "in the work," it is inevitable that some of them knew of William Irvine.
EDIT: There is in fact hard evidence for this reality a photograph of Willie Jameison sitting with William Irvine. Jack Carroll is there too (and I remember his name) but I remember hearing Mr. Jameison speak. I can remember one of the vignettes he used in one of his preachings at a specific place.
Return to "if anybody knew" ...
| |
| |
| |